Callumlord.co.uk
Callumlord is ranked 754,946 in the United Kingdom. 'The Tech Blog » For all things tech.'
754,946Rank in United Kingdom
10,702,242Worldwide Rank
Monthly pages viewed | 1,327 | |
Monthly visits | 1,021 | |
Value per visitor | -- | |
Estimated worth | £719.82 | |
External links | 15 | |
Number of pages | 60 |
Last Updated: 06/04/2018 . Estimated data, read disclaimer.
Visitors
Traffic History 90 Day Average | ||
Worldwide Rank | 8,993,481 | 817,265 |
---|---|---|
Daily Visitors | 19 | 0% |
Daily Visitors Rank | 8,453,432 | -432,434 |
Daily Pageviews | 0 | -46.03% |
Daily Pageviews Rank | 10,474,185 | 2,796,800 |
Pageviews Per User | 1.30 | -46.80% |
Content
www.Callumlord.co.uk
- Popular pages
- callumlord.co.uk The Tech Blog » Live 24/7
- callumlord.co.uk The Tech Blog » Facebook Bans Google+ Advert
- callumlord.co.uk The Tech Blog » Windows Phone Mango to come out in August?
On average 1.30 pages are viewed each, by the estimated 21 daily visitors.
Links- Links out
- en.wikipedia.org 70/20/10 Model - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- apple.com Apple - Multi-Touch Gestures - More natural control of your Mac.
- windowslive.co.uk Download Free Programs from Windows Live
- twitter.com Stewie Griffin (@StewieGriffin) on Twitter
Server Location | |
Uk2 Infrastructure England London United Kingdom 51.5, -0.12 |
Its web server is located at Uk2 Infrastructure (England, London.) ultra104.uk2.net, and ultra103.uk2.net are its DNS Nameservers. Callumlord.co.uk's IP address is 109.123.75.40.
IP: 109.123.75.40
PING (109.123.75.40) 56(84) bytes of data. | |
64 bytes from cpanel46.uk2.net (109.123.75.40): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 | 96.3 ms |
64 bytes from cpanel46.uk2.net (109.123.75.40): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 | 96.7 ms |
64 bytes from cpanel46.uk2.net (109.123.75.40): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 | 96.2 ms |
--- ping statistics --- | |
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 96.269/96.461/96.764/0.216 ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 96.269/96.461/96.764/0.216 ms |
Pinging the server, resulted in a 96.3 ms response.