Harrythehandyman.wordpress.com
Harrythehandyman is ranked > 3,000,000 in the United Kingdom. 'Storage Shed « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.'
--Rank in United Kingdom
24,465,481Worldwide Rank
Monthly pages viewed | 340 | |
Monthly visits | 340 | |
Value per visitor | -- | |
Estimated worth | £454.02 | |
External links | 36 | |
Number of pages | 180 |
Last Updated: 05/04/2018 . Estimated data, read disclaimer.
Visitors
Traffic History 90 Day Average | ||
Worldwide Rank | 20,559,228 | 11,183,649 |
---|---|---|
Daily Visitors | 6 | -72.41% |
Daily Visitors Rank | 19,195,734 | 11,074,229 |
Daily Pageviews | 0 | -72.41% |
Daily Pageviews Rank | 21,160,508 | 9,106,289 |
Pageviews Per User | 1.00 | 0% |
Content
www.Harrythehandyman.wordpress.com
- Popular pages
- harrythehandyman.wordp.. Storage Shed « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.
- harrythehandyman.wordp.. plastic plumbing fittings « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.
- harrythehandyman.wordp.. cutting copper pipe « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.
- harrythehandyman.wordp.. plumbing « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.
- harrythehandyman.wordp.. remove a radiator « Harry the handyman's Weblog G.B.
7 users visit the site each day, each viewing 1 page.
ServerServer Location | |
Layered Technologies Inc. Texas Plano United States 33.0183, -96.6186 |
Its web server is located at Layered Technologies Inc (Texas, Plano.) Harrythehandyman.wordpress.com's IP address is 72.233.69.6.
IP: 72.233.69.6
PING lb.wordpress.com (72.233.69.6) 56(84) bytes of data. | |
64 bytes from 6.69.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.233.69.6): icmp_seq=1 ttl=54 | 23.5 ms |
64 bytes from 6.69.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.233.69.6): icmp_seq=2 ttl=54 | 23.7 ms |
64 bytes from 6.69.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com (72.233.69.6): icmp_seq=3 ttl=54 | 23.5 ms |
--- lb.wordpress.com ping statistics --- | |
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 1999ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.546/23.626/23.781/0.166 ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 23.546/23.626/23.781/0.166 ms |
Pinging the server, resulted in a 23.5 ms response.