Newcastlefcnews.com
Newcastlefcnews is ranked > 3,000,000 in the United Kingdom. 'The Newcastle FC News Blog.'
--Rank in United Kingdom
--Worldwide Rank
| Monthly pages viewed | < 300 | |
| Monthly visits | < 300 | |
| Value per visitor | -- | |
| Estimated worth | £373.15 | |
| External links | 8 | |
| Number of pages | 300 |
Last Updated: 05/04/2018 . Estimated data, read disclaimer.
Content
www.Newcastlefcnews.com
- Popular pages
- newcastlefcnews.com The Newcastle FC News Blog: The striker crisis - Shola injured to ..
- newcastlefcnews.com The Newcastle FC News Blog: Who Should Newcastle Try And Sign Over ..
- newcastlefcnews.com The Newcastle FC News Blog: Ben Arfa To Play A Central Role Next ..
- newcastlefcnews.com The Newcastle FC News Blog: Newcastle FC - 2010/11 Player ratings ..
- Links out
- nufcblog.com The Newcastle United Blog — News, Views and Commentary On
- nufc.com NUFC.com
- football-scores-live.c.. Live football scores | live soccer scores | league tables
- download.cnet.com WinRAR (32-bit) - Free software downloads and software reviews
| Server Location | |
| American Registry For Internet Numbers Virginia Chantilly United States 38.8963, -77.5216 | |
Newcastlefcnews.com's server IP number is 74.125.67.121. There are 5 DNS records, such as dns4.name-services.com, dns3.name-services.com, and dns2.name-services.com. Its web server is located at American Registry For Internet Numbers (Virginia, Chantilly.)
IP: 74.125.67.121
| PING ghs.l.google.com (209.85.145.121) 56(84) bytes of data. | |
| 64 bytes from cbf02m01-in-f121.1e100.net (209.85.145.121): icmp_req=1 ttl=54 | 21.7 ms |
| 64 bytes from cbf02m01-in-f121.1e100.net (209.85.145.121): icmp_req=2 ttl=54 | 21.7 ms |
| 64 bytes from cbf02m01-in-f121.1e100.net (209.85.145.121): icmp_req=3 ttl=54 | 21.7 ms |
| --- ghs.l.google.com ping statistics --- | |
| 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2002ms | |
| rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.777/21.781/21.789/0.170 ms | |
| rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 21.777/21.781/21.789/0.170 ms |
Pinging the server, resulted in a 21.7 ms response.