
Macit.org
Macit is ranked 641,512 in the United Kingdom. 'Direct Marketing Definition.'
641,512Rank in United Kingdom
5,138,039Worldwide Rank
Monthly pages viewed | 384 | |
Monthly visits | 384 | |
Value per visitor | £1.21 | |
Estimated worth | £464.91 | |
External links | 84 | |
Number of pages | 225 |
Last Updated: 06/04/2018 . Estimated data, read disclaimer.
Visitors
Traffic History 90 Day Average | ||
Worldwide Rank | 4,317,680 | ![]() |
---|---|---|
Daily Visitors | 41 | ![]() |
Daily Visitors Rank | 4,961,566 | ![]() |
Daily Pageviews | 150 | ![]() |
Daily Pageviews Rank | 3,798,269 | ![]() |
Pageviews Per User | 3.00 | ![]() |
Content
www.Macit.org
Age: The domain is 15 years and 1 months old.
- Popular pages
- macit.org Direct Marketing Definition » Blog Archive » What is a Good ..
- macit.org Direct Marketing Definition » Blog Archive » Direct Marketing ..
- macit.org Direct Marketing Definition » Blog Archive » Direct Mail ..
- macit.org Direct Marketing Definition » Blog Archive » Email Marketing ..
44 users visit the site each day, each viewing 3.00 pages.
Links- Links out
- lusogolf.org Golf Tournament
- newcityfl.org Business Plan For Restaurant
- broken-windows.org Windows Repair
Server Location | |
Softlayer Technologies Inc. Texas Dallas United States 32.8367, -96.796 |
Its 2 nameservers are apr2.gmserv.net, and apr1.gmserv.net. The server is hosted by Softlayer Technologies Inc (Texas, Dallas.) Its IP Number is 74.86.60.192.
IP: 74.86.60.192
PING (74.86.60.192) 56(84) bytes of data. | |
64 bytes from 74.86.60.192-static.reverse.softlayer.com (74.86.60.192): icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 | 34.4 ms |
64 bytes from 74.86.60.192-static.reverse.softlayer.com (74.86.60.192): icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 | 34.4 ms |
64 bytes from 74.86.60.192-static.reverse.softlayer.com (74.86.60.192): icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 | 34.5 ms |
--- ping statistics --- | |
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2001ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.444/34.484/34.547/0.158 ms | |
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 34.444/34.484/34.547/0.158 ms |
Pinging the server, resulted in a 34.4 ms response.